by AGFDfishguy » Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:13 pm
I'll attempt to post an update tomorrow on the outcome of the MSCP meeting for the proposed developments to the west of Mittry Lake, once I confer with my supervisor, who attended the afternoon public meeting at Hidden Shores (public attendance at that meeting was minimal; I think there were 16 or 18 agency people in attendance, and only two from the public; there was another meeting in the evening, and I have no idea what the attendance, or the outcome, at that meeting was). You can rest assured that there will be no restrictions to the existing fishing regulations on Mittry Lake (that would happen only over our cold, dead bodies, and would require a Commission approved change to Commission Order 40, an unlikely event). Still a little up in the air is what restrictions may apply to the new improvements, should they occur. AGFD's intent is to provide additional fishing opportunities, but there could be some restrictions to access when this thing finally shakes out. AGFD will be closely involved with that process, and will do everything we can to ensure that fishing access will be allowed. We view the MSCP project as beneficial, as it may end up supplying more fresh water into Mittry Lake, and that can't be anything but good.
Bob mentioned the proposed dredging above Laguna Dam. The USBR has it as a proposed activity, but that is contingent on funding, and we're not sure if and when it will be accomplished. Should it eventually happen, it could provide a pretty neat place to fish, but be aware that it will probably be completed on Quechan property, and will require a Tribal permit to legally fish. Land ownership in that part of the river is very complicated (Arizona, California and Tribal jurisdictions around Laguna Dam intersect, and are subject to interpretation...). These proposed improvements are pretty exciting, though, and if they are realized, should benefit sport fisheries and native species alike.
